<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Libertatia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog</link>
	<description>Can&#039;t stop the signal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:02:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by T_UNIX</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-6399</link>
		<dc:creator>T_UNIX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-6399</guid>
		<description>FUCKING Tags and even worse validation!!
Hope escaping works:
if (a \&lt;b&gt; { fmt.Printf(&quot;Hello, world\n&quot;) }</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FUCKING Tags and even worse validation!!<br />
Hope escaping works:<br />
if (a \<b> { fmt.Printf(&#8220;Hello, world\n&#8221;) }</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by T_UNIX</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-6398</link>
		<dc:creator>T_UNIX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-6398</guid>
		<description>Are you sure about this line?
if (a &lt;b&gt; { fmt.Printf(&quot;Hello, world\n&quot;) }
The bracket behind &#039;b&#039; seems to be weird....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure about this line?<br />
if (a <b> { fmt.Printf(&#8220;Hello, world\n&#8221;) }<br />
The bracket behind &#8216;b&#8217; seems to be weird&#8230;.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-4773</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-4773</guid>
		<description>Funny, I guess no one ran into the problem of their variable names colliding with those 5 reserved-and-useless keywords.  Surely they will be taken out before a &#039;final&#039; release :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I guess no one ran into the problem of their variable names colliding with those 5 reserved-and-useless keywords.  Surely they will be taken out before a &#8216;final&#8217; release <img src='http://www.libertatia.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-4771</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-4771</guid>
		<description>@Kurtis:If you prefer that type of syntax over the curly style, you might want to take a look at Ada: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_(programming_language):-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kurtis:If you prefer that type of syntax over the curly style, you might want to take a look at Ada: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_(programming_language):-)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_(programming_language):-)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enlightenment Frequently Mistaken Answers by Enlightenment E17 kommt bald &#8211; Wirklich! ;-) &#171; Trompetenkaefer&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=234&#038;cpage=1#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightenment E17 kommt bald &#8211; Wirklich! ;-) &#171; Trompetenkaefer&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=234#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>[...] E17 kommt bald &#8211; Wirklich!&#160;;-)  Laut diesem Entwicklerblog  soll E17 wirklich bald als Stableversion freigegeben werden. Auf ein definitives Datum will sich [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] E17 kommt bald &#8211; Wirklich!&nbsp;;-)  Laut diesem Entwicklerblog  soll E17 wirklich bald als Stableversion freigegeben werden. Auf ein definitives Datum will sich [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-4768</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-4768</guid>
		<description>Meh! The code wasn&#039;t escaped and there&#039;s no preview for me to see what a cock up I&#039;d made. Anyway, the first line is supposed to be the if statement in the first example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh! The code wasn&#8217;t escaped and there&#8217;s no preview for me to see what a cock up I&#8217;d made. Anyway, the first line is supposed to be the if statement in the first example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-4767</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-4767</guid>
		<description>if (a &lt;b&gt; { fmt.Printf(&quot;Hello, world\n&quot;) }

Is that really the syntax in the first example? An open bracket with no closing bracket but a closing greater than?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if (a <b> { fmt.Printf(&#8220;Hello, world\n&#8221;) }</p>
<p>Is that really the syntax in the first example? An open bracket with no closing bracket but a closing greater than?</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by Maxii</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-4766</guid>
		<description>Actually, you have to press four keys to do &quot;{}&quot; but only three for &quot;end&quot;. At least on my keyboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you have to press four keys to do &#8220;{}&#8221; but only three for &#8220;end&#8221;. At least on my keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by Adam Lohr</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Lohr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>Just to elaborate, cbeck&#039;s comment is actually valid go syntax.  The println isn&#039;t supposed to be used in non-bootstrapping code but you can easily replace it with import &quot;fmt&quot; and fmt.Println.

I also find braces more readable and less verbose than then / end, and the distinction between := and = is necessary to allow shadowing. (Which I guess is of arguable value).  It does make clear to the reader that the value is being declared and not just assigned to though.  Also, the removal of parenthesis for function calls is questionable in a non-functional language, since they really help readability when you get to be nesting calls.  Haskell does some beautiful things with it and the automatic currying, but it can make a mess sometimes too.  There&#039;s also the issue of tuple assignment conflicting with argument separation if you use commas for the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to elaborate, cbeck&#8217;s comment is actually valid go syntax.  The println isn&#8217;t supposed to be used in non-bootstrapping code but you can easily replace it with import &#8220;fmt&#8221; and fmt.Println.</p>
<p>I also find braces more readable and less verbose than then / end, and the distinction between := and = is necessary to allow shadowing. (Which I guess is of arguable value).  It does make clear to the reader that the value is being declared and not just assigned to though.  Also, the removal of parenthesis for function calls is questionable in a non-functional language, since they really help readability when you get to be nesting calls.  Haskell does some beautiful things with it and the automatic currying, but it can make a mess sometimes too.  There&#8217;s also the issue of tuple assignment conflicting with argument separation if you use commas for the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interesting keywords on Google&#8217;s Go language by messias</title>
		<link>http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247&#038;cpage=1#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>messias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertatia.org/blog/?p=247#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>@donaldguy: there are actually five of them: &#039;notwithstanding&#039;, &#039;thetruthofthematter&#039;, &#039;despiteallobjections&#039;, &#039;whereas&#039; and &#039;insofaras&#039;. No need to do much source diving if you want to check for yourself, just do a quick search on the page I linked to for any of them, there is only one occurrence of each there, and they are right next to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@donaldguy: there are actually five of them: &#8216;notwithstanding&#8217;, &#8216;thetruthofthematter&#8217;, &#8216;despiteallobjections&#8217;, &#8216;whereas&#8217; and &#8216;insofaras&#8217;. No need to do much source diving if you want to check for yourself, just do a quick search on the page I linked to for any of them, there is only one occurrence of each there, and they are right next to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
